The Wolfman movie reviews
Write a ReviewFriday, January 28, 2011 9:11:24 AM | (Age Not Specified)
really bad movie....the acing, other than Emily Blunt, was awful....even the special effects weren't that good. A very disappointing flick.
Saturday, November 27, 2010 3:30:26 AM | (Age Not Specified)
It rocks! 5/5
Thursday, August 12, 2010 12:11:34 PM | (Age Not Specified)
One of the worst movies I've seen. A complete wate of talent and time.
Wednesday, July 28, 2010 2:58:39 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This movie was not without its charm. I really shouldn't fault it for "not being my cup of tea", because what it does, it does well. I just was not really on board. I'm quite a fan of period piece horror, and this is a good example. There's something about the set pieces and the mood of the film that really reminds me of Alan Moore's comics (and adaptations), which is something that definitely works in this film's favor. I really like the way the remake really nailed the theme of a werewolf being powerless to control or restrain the actions of the wolf he becomes, and being racked with dread the night before and guilt the next day. Benicio Del Toro was a rather inspired choice for Lawren
Monday, July 26, 2010 12:44:46 PM | (Age Not Specified)
This movie was a huge dissapointment!! the parties involved in making this garbage should be embarassed with themselves as no effort was clealry made to make a decent movie. I guess the studio thought "just put Del Toro, Blunt and Hopkins in it and people will enjoy it". it was one of the worst movies I have ever seen.
Saturday, July 24, 2010 12:18:23 PM | (Age Not Specified)
Horrible movie. First, the director obviosuly had no clune what he was doing as the scenes were disjointed and unintelligible at time. Secondly, I needed subtitltes to understand Del Toro. He's a very good actor , but he needs to be reminded not to mumble. Finally, the script sucked. What a waste of talent. The only thing worth watching was Emily Blunt.
Tuesday, July 06, 2010 3:37:05 PM | (Age Not Specified)
horrible.
Wednesday, June 16, 2010 2:24:44 PM | (age group: 2-17) | F
It was pretty good, gory but good. It wasnt that scary and some parts were a little slow.wait for the rental
Saturday, June 12, 2010 8:36:01 AM | (Age Not Specified)
The visual effects were good.Story line was predictable, but very enjoyable. Not too gory like too many movies today trying to sell the stroy lines with gore.I'd see it again.
Tuesday, June 08, 2010 8:22:05 PM | (Age Not Specified)
it was ok
